EMBARGOED UNTIL 11:00 GMT, MONDAY 4 FEBRUARY 2002

Safety checks for GM foods must be better, says Royal Society

Safety assessments should be improved before a greater variety of foods made from genetically modified plants are declared fit for human consumption, a Royal Society report warns today (4 February 2002).

The report concludes that there is no reason to doubt the safety of foods made from GM ingredients that are currently available, nor to believe that genetic modification makes foods inherently less safe than their conventional counterparts. However, the report calls for the tightening of regulations for all novel foods, particularly with respect to allergy testing and the nutritional content of infant formula.

The report also recommends that the methods for comparing GM foods with their conventional counterparts, by applying the principle of 'substantial equivalence', should be made more explicit and objective during safety assessments, and harmonised between Member States of the European Union.

Professor Jim Smith, who chaired the working group that produced the report, said: "We have looked at all of the available research, and found nothing to suggest that the process of genetic modification makes potential foodstuffs inherently unsafe. However, we fully support the public's right to know that all new foods, regardless of whether they contain GM ingredients, are subjected to rigorous safety and nutritional checks."

He added: "The rather piecemeal approach to the regulation of GM foods in the UK, and EU in general, means that there may be some important gaps and inconsistencies. It is obvious that consumers want their food to be safeguarded by rules that are rigorous enough to prevent any loopholes. But the legislation must not be so restrictive that it removes any incentive for introducing new food products that are potentially beneficial to society."

The report concludes that the use of DNA from viruses during the genetic modification of plants poses a negligible risk to human health. Similarly, consumers would not face any added threat if they digested food containing plant DNA that has been genetically modified.

However, the report recommends that allergy screening of all new foodstuffs, regardless of whether they contain GM ingredients, should be extended to include risks from inhalation. At present tests are only carried out for material that is eaten, but there are potential risks of allergic reactions, particularly for people involved in growing and producing food products, from breathing in pollen, spores and dust.

Although genetic modification may be used in future to improve the quality of food, it could also have unintended adverse impacts on nutrition. The report points out that babies are particularly vulnerable to changes in the nutritional content of their food, and recommends that UK and EU laws should be re-examined to ensure that rigorous tests are carried out if GM ingredients are one day considered for use in infant formula.

The working group considered the results of research made available since 1998, as well as evidence submitted by food regulators, biotechnology companies and non-governmental organisations. All oral evidence has been posted on the Royal Society web site.

NOTES FOR EDITORS

    1. The Royal Society is an independent academy promoting the natural and applied sciences. Founded in 1660, the Society has three roles, as the UK academy of science, as a learned Society, and as a funding agency. It responds to individual demand with selection by merit, not by field.

The Society's objectives are to:
*recognise excellence in science
*support leading-edge scientific research and its applications
*stimulate international interaction
*further the role of science, engineering and technology in society
*promote education in the sciences and actively engage the public in scientific issues
*provide independent authoritative advice on matters relating to science, engineering and technology
*encourage research into the history of science
For further information, contact: Bob Ward, Press and Public Relations,
Royal Society, London, Tel: 020 7451 2516

Genetically modified plants for food use and human health - an update


©2001 ANBio - Associação Nacional de Biossegurança.
All rights reserved.