SOCIETY OF TOXICOLOGY BACKS GM SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE

October 11, 2002
Crop Biotech Update
www.isaaa.org/kc

The Society of Toxicology says that the risks associated with GM plants "are not different in nature from those created by conventional breeding practices for plant, animal, or microbial enhancement, and are already familiar to toxicologists. It is therefore important to recognize that it is the food product itself, rather than the process through which it is made, that should be the focus of attention in assessing safety. On this basis it backs the principle of substantial equivalence, through which GM plants are evaluated in comparison to their non-GM equivalents".

The Society of Toxicology has just adopted a position paper, "The Safety of Genetically Modified Foods Produced Through Biotechnology". It says that > to establish substantial equivalence, extensive comparative studies of the chemical composition, nutritional quality, and levels of potentially toxic components in both the engineered and conventional crop or animal are conducted. Notable differences between the existing and new organism would require further evaluation to determine whether the engineered form presents a higher level of risk.

The Society concludes that at present, "no verifiable evidence of adverse health effects" of biotechnology-derived (BD) foods has been reported, "although the current passive reporting system probably would not detect minor or rare adverse effects or a moderate increase in effects with a high background incidence such as diarrhea." It notes that future genetic engineering projects might cause more substantial and complex changes in a foodstuff.

"Methods have not yet been developed with which whole foods (in contrast to single chemical components) can be fully evaluated for safety," says the paper. "Progress also needs to be made in developing definitive methods for the identification and characterization of proteins that are potential allergens and this is currently a major focus of research. A continuing evolution of toxicological methodologies and regulatory strategies will be necessary to ensure that the present level of safety of biotechnology-derived foods is maintained in the future."

The full paper is available at www.toxicology.org/Information/GovernmentMedia/GM_Food.html.

The address for any administrative command like unsubscribe, subscribe or help is:

GENTECH-REQUEST@gen.free.de
The searchable WWW list archive is available at
http://www.gene.ch

 


©2001 ANBio - Associação Nacional de Biossegurança.
All rights reserved.